A reading deck
AuthorAware
A simple tool that lets human writers prove — to anyone — that they wrote what they wrote.
Aaron Kushner · authoraware.org
Two voices, one problem
Real people. Real stakes.
"It's like the new McCarthyism. It's just crazy. People are demanding proof of something that can't be proven."
— Sarah Suzuki, copywriter
The Wall Street Journal · May 2026
"I watched a freshman I knew sign the declaration that he'd done his homework without A.I. as ChatGPT was still open in the next window."
— Theo Baker, Stanford senior
The New York Times · May 2026
A professional writer unable to prove her own innocence, and a student signing a declaration he knows to be false. These aren't separate problems. They're the same problem seen from opposite sides of the same broken system.
The Problem · Part 1
Writers can't prove they wrote it.
AI writing is now indistinguishable from human writing. Real authors are caught in the crossfire.
- Anyone can generate a convincing essay in 30 seconds.
- AI-detection tools are wrong often enough to ruin careers.
- The default assumption is shifting: guilty until proven innocent.
- Writers have no way to defend themselves — until now.
The Problem · Part 2
Publishers can't tell either.
Schools, publishers, prize committees — anyone evaluating writing — is flying blind.
- No reliable way to spot AI-generated submissions.
- Detection tools fail. The cost of a wrong call is high in both directions.
- The whole credentialing system of writing is breaking down.
- Real human creative labor risks becoming worthless if it can't be verified.
What's been tried
Detection doesn't work.
Every existing approach tries to spot AI after the fact. None of them are reliable enough to base a career on.
| Approach |
Scales to everyone? |
Hard to fake? |
Proves a human wrote it? |
Verifiable later? |
| AI DetectionTurnitin, GPTZero, Copyleaks |
✓ |
✗ |
✗ |
✗ |
| WatermarkingHidden patterns in AI output |
✓ |
✗ |
✗ |
✗ |
| Version HistoryGoogle Docs revision log |
✓ |
✗ |
✗ |
✗ |
| In-person ProctoringLocked-room writing tests |
✗ |
✓ |
✓ |
✗ |
| AuthorAwareProcess-level certification |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
The flip
Record the process, not the output.
Everyone already knows mechanical keystroke recording would solve this. Nobody's shipped a usable version — so we built one.
- The idea is obvious: log the writing, prove the human, done.
- Building it well is the hard part — it has to be private, portable, and tamper-proof all at once.
- AuthorAware captures every keystroke locally, then seals it with a cryptographic chain. Nothing leaves your machine until you choose to share the proof.
- Anyone can verify the record without trusting us, the publisher, or you.
[ Image · AuthorAware writing surface with live attestation ledger ]
illustratassist prompt TBD: clean editor screenshot with subtle chain-of-blocks side panel
Not an imposition
A better place to write.
AuthorAware isn't surveillance bolted onto Word. It's a writer's environment that happens to produce verifiable proof as a side effect of using it.
- A focused, personal writing surface — designed for the actual work of writing, not for committees.
- Local first. Your drafts live on your machine. Nothing is uploaded until you choose to publish a proof.
- Cross-platform. Same writing surface on Mac, Windows, Linux, and web.
- The certification happens quietly in the background. You never have to think about it.
Match the proof to the stakes
Three tiers, three levels of evidence.
A blogger doesn't need the same proof as a Pulitzer finalist. AuthorAware scales with the stakes.
Tier 1
Basic
Bloggers, students, hobbyists
Keystroke log. Quick install. Free. Proves you actually typed it.
Tier 2
Verified
Professionals, submissions
Adds identity binding and a verifiable session. Suitable for publisher review.
Tier 3
Proctored
Prizes, journalism, courts
Screen and webcam capture at 1 frame per second, sealed alongside the keystroke chain. Autonomous proctoring — no human watcher, same evidentiary weight as a locked-room test.
The bigger picture
Trust needs infrastructure.
Banks have audits. Doctors have boards. Writers don't have anything — yet. AuthorAware is the missing layer.
- Every industry that survived a credibility crisis built infrastructure.
- Writers and publishers face that crisis now.
- The infrastructure shouldn't be owned by one platform or one company.
- It should be open, verifiable, and free — like the web itself.
Wherever humans work with computers
The method extends. Far.
Writing is one case. The same architecture — keystroke chain, cryptographic hash, trusted timestamp, exportable credential — works anywhere a person's work needs to carry proof of human effort. Non-intrusive, secure, immutable attribution.
- Legal documents. Pro se filings are flooding federal courts with AI-generated motions. Courts have no way to tell.
- Scientific papers. Provenance for findings — not just citations, but the chain from notes to published claim.
- Financial and regulatory filings. Audit trails for human judgment under the eyes of regulators.
- Code commits. Prove a human wrote that pull request — especially for security-critical systems.
- Journalism. Source notes and drafts as part of the published record.
- And anywhere else AI can simulate authority faster than honest actors can produce it.
How to take this further
Read it. Try it. Help build it.
AuthorAware is open infrastructure for the people who write. Three ways to engage.